Sunday, August 30

If we evolved from monkeys then why are there still monkeys?

I was browsing through yahoo answers when I saw this question. Curious as to how this discussion panned out, I scrolled through the answers and found this gem:

"Some monkey-brained evil-lootionists came up with the idea.
That has to be an indictment against us humans if such drivel were true.
Most of the funds for archaeological research comes from occultists who have a specific agenda. According to their secret doctrines, the British Royalty have blue blood and are direct descendants from angels who mated with men. The other inferior mortals--they evolved from monkeys. Unfortunately, some of us know that in 1603 England passed a law to purge the mongrel seed of the monarchy. Many of Prince Charles's relatives had married into the French royal bloodlines. The Louis' were notorious for marrying black women. One of Charles great uncles carried those genes. They even nicknamed him "the black prince." They never allowed him to marry.
Anyway, they have since purged the infidels and made them dukes and duchesses. You see why they had tried to prevent Charles from marrying Camilla?
"

Now, we are all sick and tired of arguing whether we come from apes (/monkeys) or dust and a sample of Adam's ribcage, but still I can't help but wonder where this rendition of European history came about. I, like you probably, am totally baffled by his reply. The more I read it, the farther I think I am from understanding it. Here is my best guess as to what he means: evolutionists have been mislead because these people, who mingle with black women and believe people must be descendants of either monkeys or angels, paid scientists to publish their take on our origins. Mind you, that's just a "best" guess. I can't even begin to fathom how the Louis' and their future duchesses fit into this "evil-outionist" conspiracy; that'll just completely destroy my faint comprehension of his reply. Why does it feel like he just dumped as many historical references he could make so he could cover his tracks and confuse the shit out of everyone on the Internet? Maybe I'm just dense when it comes to religious tripe. Maybe there's a few things about British law that I'm not educated on. But I'm not ranting and raving on my blog at 4 in the morning to discredit his ability to write...

This guy's response just brings to attention my gripes with established religions. I just find it extremely ironic when he cries fowl because some rich, power mongrels in history gathered heads to come up with some sort of dogma to render their status forever "un-usurpable", like the way kids shriek "SAFE" in a close game of tag. It's almost as though he hasn't taken to consideration the kind of people that probably wrote the bible and the reason why anyone would write something ultimately so oppressive to humanity. To me, it's weird that he sees the logical faults in mating angels and "blue blood" (and claims to see one in the theory of evolution) but fails to see the same irrationality in, and I quote him:

"I do not want to be presumptuous: however the child might be exhibiting more than the symptoms of autism. Any time a person craves for feces, usually that is a sign of demonic possession. Check these other symptoms also: Is his/her sleep interrupted? Does the child either speak to or attempt to speak to other people when no-one else is in his/her room?
IF THE ANSWER IS YES TO ALL OF THE ABOVE, ONLY, then I assess that some parent on either side--going back 4 generations (Exodus 34:6/7) either dabbled in or with occultism) committed abortions/murders or was a practicing homosexual died in an unrepented state and those spiritual iniquities fell on the poor child. Notice I said: if all of the symptoms above manifest."

Seriously.

This is his intelligent advice to a woman who is installing tiles in her bathroom so that her autistic kid can stop eating the plaster and smearing feces on her bathroom wall. Looks like the pot is calling the kettle black.

Friday, August 21

오늘 망햇어.

Friday, August 14

WHAT ARE YOU DOING WITH YOUR LIFE?

You can find me in a dimly lit corner at Psychobabble today, pondering this very question.

Sunday, August 2

An excerpt

jane: i'm watching this video of a fanboys q and a panel

jane: and i spotted zach levi in the audience

ian: hhahha

ian: haha

ian: at comicon?

jane: it was their premiere i think

jane: dude i'm like 98% sure it's him

ian: link me

jane: see for yourself http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDs6pozauNo

jane: 3:40

jane: that just has to be him

ian: haha that is him

ian: i have verified it

jane: hahahaha

jane: this is crazy

jane: i hope they're friends in real life?

jane: so that if i see one, i can see the other

ian: i wish it was chuck and not levi?

jane: i wish chris rodriguez and chuck were friends

ian: hahahahahahahahahahahahah

jane: that's like

jane: my ultimate fantasy in one sentence

ian: thank you so much for calling him chris rodriguez instead of marquette

ian: jane you are awesome because of that

jane: everything creepy about my obsession with both of chuck and chris is embodied in those 8 words